ReSpect |
ACCESSION
|
||||
![]() |
Search Example
-
The following separators are available:
\s (Whitespace character) \n (Carriage return character, Carriage return code) \t (Tab) ; (Semicolon) : (Colon) -
Example 1 (Tryptophan)146.0634 159.0952 188.0755 205.0977
-
Example 2 (Tryptophan)146.0634;159.0952;188.0755;205.0977;
Fragment Search
- Fragment search is a spectrum search, which is based on only the matching of m/z values in MS/MS data.
Query data : m/z values of your MS/MS data Record : m/z value of ReSpect record -
1. Execution of spectrum search using query and record
MS/MS data of query and record : Q, R m/z value of query and record : Qx, Rx Match : |Qx1 - Rx1| ≤ m/z tolerance Match : |Qx2 - Rx2| ≤ m/z tolerance Mismatch : |Qx3 - Rx3| > m/z tolerance
MS/MS fragmentation association rule (September 2011)
-
1. Setting for ReSpect record selection
Relative intensity : ≤20% Ranking : Top 10 Total : 8,623 ReSpect records -
2. Calculation of MS/MS fragmentation association rule
2-1. Using association rule algorithm (see →), total 4,063,748 rules were enumerated.
2-2. After the calculation of association rules, the 12,220 of MS/MS fragmentation association rules are defined as followed.In a rule, the antecedent is a single and max value of m/z in the rule.Difference of m/z values between antecedent and consequent is more than 10.Transactions are grouped by same polarity and adduct type in a compound class level 1.Table
2-3. Calculation of index values for a rule.Number of transaction including antecedent (X)Number of transaction including consequent (Y)Number of all transaction (Z)Support (X) = count (X) ÷ count (Z)Support (Y) = count (Y) ÷ count (Z)Support (X⇒Y) = count (X∪Y) ÷ count (Z)Confidence (X⇒Y) = count (X∪Y) ÷ count (X)Lift (X⇒Y) = Confidence (X⇒Y) ÷ Support (Y)Example evaluation of a rule (A⇒B) Support (A⇒B) Frequency of A⇒B can estimate as percentage, e.g., 0–100%. Confidence (A⇒B) Strength of A⇒B can estimate as percentage, e.g., 0–100%. Lift (A⇒B) Independence of A⇒B can estimate as criterion variable, e.g., 0–∞. Lift values greater than 1 Frequency of a rule has positively effect on frequency of antecedent. Lift value is less than 1 Frequency of a rule has negatively effect on frequency of antecedent. Lift value close to 1 Frequency of a rule has no effect on frequency of antecedent.